> Voting early was something I touted
> from the start and
> still advise everyone to do.
You did !
But this person here is one hunted by real life dates
that I always do first what is most pressing ;-)
So probably I will behave again badly
and postpone reading and voting until
the very last hour ;-)
Sorry about that, but so is my mind's organization.
I think Nerwen has a similar problem
as she counted to fulfil her promises
and did not send her votes because she
accounted this as a little bit less pressing.
There might be more personalities
like ours ;-)
> And I also told people how to
> have their
> e-mail client deliver the message on an assigned date.
Yes, you did !
But then I thought, my PC has to be at least
powered and my e-mail program started
to send the message. In this case
I would have to be at home on amnesty date
or any other decisive voting time.
And then there is no need any more to
set the e-mail client to an assigned date.
Because I wrote the votes into an prepared e-mail
anyhow stored on the hard disk.
My problem is to have the e-mail client working
in the decisive phases.
This _is_ easier during a week of voting
but was not on amnesty day which was
on a weekend if I remember rightly.
Maybe you thought on the provider client ?
I have never tested this as well.
Maybe I will have tested this until next year.
> Some
> even sent me
> their votes and had me post them by proxy.
I will consider this next time ;-)
>
> There is already a poll on whether we will just have one
> block during voting
> season or split voting season up as it was this year. The
> length of voting
> season may be changed as well (though it was voted on
> before), but there is
> a limit to it.
Yes, I voted :-)
> 3 months is way over that limit. Most people
> (non-lurkers) have wanted it to be shorter.
> We can't have it both ways anyway.
Sigh, there are so many different minds and opinions
as there are persons !
Best wishes Elanor