Yahoo Forum Archive

This is an archive of the MEFA Yahoo Group, which was shut down by Yahoo in 2019. The archive can be sorted by month and by topic ID. You can use your browser to search by keyword within the month or topic you have open.

JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2004---18210426558925263362316285
20051895610753834744697276194358565136
200623166277611713912756676615979
200720257-297299143318583103
2008561335424014127477516090106
2009283-39194101722722153624
201067-14103138129321316330
20111-172625906132758
201230---812276-----
2013------------
2014---------1-2
2015------------
2016------------
2017------------
2018------------
2019---------1--

Msg# 4690

Races/Places: Villains, Check Ballot #3 Posted by Ainaechoiriel June 09, 2005 - 2:01:31 Topic ID# 4690
Check Ballots for Main Category Races/Places: Villains

Sand Circle, The (49): A L Milton
G, Reason for Rating: N/A
Romance Partners: N/A
A day in the life of Anguo, an oliphaunt trainer. Short vignette in which
legends are retold, baths are taken, and feet are scraped.

For Love of Creation (92): Andreth
PG, Reason for Rating: adult themes
Romance Partners: Sauron/OFC
As he stands on the rebuilt tower of Barad-dûr while his armies prepare to
leave for Eregion, Annatar/Sauron contemplates the desire for creation and
the consequences for those who suffer from it: Fëanor, Morgoth and Ilúvatar,
but particularly himself.

Servant of Elbereth (796): Beethoven's 7th
G, Reason for Rating: n/a
Romance Partners: n/a
In Mordor, it is not only Gollum who follows Frodo and Sam ...

Giving Gifts (241): Dwimordene
G, Reason for Rating: n/a
Romance Partners: n/a
A boy of Harad learns a lesson from his father on the proper way to give the
most precious of gifts.

Sweet Meat (1073): Ijemanja
PG-13, Reason for Rating: horrific imagery, adult themes
Romance Partners: n/a
"Shelob was gone; and whether she lay long in her lair, nursing her malice
and her misery, and in slow years of darkness healed herself from within,
rebuilding her clustered eyes, until with hunger like death she spun once
more her dreadful snares in the glens of the Mountains of Shadow, this tale
does not tell." (LOTR, book IV, chapter X) Here, then, is the untold tale of
Shelob after her encounter with Sam. Her hunger is great, but she is good at
waiting, and there are many footfalls along her dark tunnels these days...

Red Fire, Black Blood (1121): just_sphinx
PG, Reason for Rating: adult themes
Romance Partners: n/a
Morgoth reflects in the Void, ever remembering the one who escaped.
Featuring Morgoth, Maedhros.

Bitter as Willow (801): Nickey
PG-13, Reason for Rating: For some frightening themes
Romance Partners: N/A
Old Man Willow has vengeance within his grasp...

Cornfield, The (530): Tanaqui
G, Reason for Rating: n/a
Romance Partners: n/a
Just why is there a cornfield in the middle of an otherwise very
English-looking Shire? And how does Frodo get so far ahead of Sam that Sam
"loses" him?



SubCategory: Races/Places: Villains: Drabble

The Men of the South (233): Dwimordene
PG, Reason for Rating: Generally dark atmosphere
Romance Partners: none
The villainy of war is manifold: the final stages of the battle of Pelennor
Field.

Alas, Poor Ufthak! (200): Elena Tiriel
G, Reason for Rating: n/a
Romance Partners: n/a
"'D'you remember old Ufthak? We lost him for days. Then we found him in a
corner; hanging up he was, but he was wide awake and glaring. How we
laughed! She'd forgotten him, maybe, but we didn't touch him -- no good
interfering with [Shelob]' ..." (The Two Towers, "The Choices of Master
Samwise")

Triumph Incarnate (198): Elena Tiriel
G, Reason for Rating: n/a
Romance Partners: n/a
"And Sauron, sitting in his black seat in the midst of the Temple, had
laughed when he heard the trumpets of Ar-Pharazôn sounding for battle; and
again he had laughed when he heard the thunder of the storm; and a third
time, even as he laughed at his own thought, thinking what he would do now
in the world, being rid of the Edain for ever, he was taken in the midst of
his mirth, and his seat and his temple fell into the abyss. But Sauron was
not of mortal flesh, and though he was robbed now of that shape in which he
had wrought so great an evil ... yet his spirit arose out of the deep ...
and came back to Middle-earth...." (The Silmarillion, "Akallabêth")

Orc's Best Friend (384): Forodwaith
G, Reason for Rating: n/a
Romance Partners: n/a
A moment between a warg-rider and his steed.

Roast Mutton (1362): Marta
G, Reason for Rating: n/a
Romance Partners: n/a
Bilbo tries to burgle the trolls.

Nine Riders (791): Rabidsamfan
G, Reason for Rating: N/A
Romance Partners: N/A
A set of nine drabbles, one for each of the Black Riders, exploring their
personalities, such as they were...

Long March, The (542): Tanaqui
G, Reason for Rating: n/a
Romance Partners: n/a
The thoughts of one of the Haradrim seen by Sam in Ithilien, just before the
Rangers attack.



SubCategory: Races/Places: Villains: Nazgul

Shadowsong (714): Ellisande
PG, Reason for Rating: adult themes
Romance Partners: n/a
"But the hearts of men are easily corrupted..." Why did Sauron's corruption
work so well with men and how much of the man is left after ages in the
shadow? An attempt to look into the mind of the Lord of the Nazgul.

This Too Shall Pass (742): Isabeau of Greenlea
G, Reason for Rating: n/a
Romance Partners: n/a
An alternate ending to the scene at Osgiliath with Frodo and the Nazgul.

Cursed Queen of Angmar (450): khazar_khum
R, Reason for Rating: violence, torture, erotic content, mature themes
Romance Partners: Witch-king/OFC (Ariashal)
Ariashal of Rhudaur is the unwitting lynchpin of her father's machinations
with the Witch-king of Angmar. And she's cursed, too.

Gift of Rule (470): Lyllyn
PG, Reason for Rating: adult themes
Romance Partners: n/a
The thoughts of the Witch-king when the gift was given... and accepted.

Once (485): Meril
G, Reason for Rating: n/a
Romance Partners: n/a
The Lord of the Nazgûl reflects on his mortal life.



SubCategory: Races/Places: Villains: Orcs

Enmities (561): AmandaK
PG, Reason for Rating: adult themes
Romance Partners: n/a
While men will fight for honor, renown and riches, women have other reasons
to fight. A retrospective look at the War of the Ring from an unusual
viewpoint.

Strange Bedfellows (250): Dwimordene
PG, Reason for Rating: adult themes
Romance Partners: n/a
An incident between the different armies of Orcs, after the attack on Parth
Galen.

The Last Stand (76): Soledad
PG-13, Reason for Rating: Violence and Sexual Encounters
Romance Partners: N/A
That famous last fight between Éomer and Uglúk, seen from Uglúk's
perspective. A feeble attempt to create a glimpse of the culture of the
Uruk-hai... if there is such thing. I leave the judgement to you, oh most
gracious readers.

One Dark Day in Lugbúrz (521): Starlight
G, Reason for Rating: n/a
Romance Partners: n/a
The orcs of Lugburz set Gollum free.

Full Circle (348): Werecat
PG, Reason for Rating: disturbing images
Romance Partners: n/a
"Beasts, they've called us". So end the days of Kolgrun, last warrior of the
race of orcs.

Wish upon a star (194): Werecat
PG-13, Reason for Rating: Rating and warning for violence and disturbing
subjects, although nothing graphic
Romance Partners: interspecies (orc/OFC)
Girl falls to Middle Earth, hoping to meet the object of her desire:
Legolas. However, things turn quite differently from what she expected. AU,
of course. Parody/Black humour.



SubCategory: Races/Places: Villains: Poetry

Melkor (440): Joan Milligan
PG, Reason for Rating: adult themes
Romance Partners: n/a
Melkor during the Great Music.

Sauron (442): Joan Milligan
G, Reason for Rating: n/a
Romance Partners: n/a
Sauron during the Akallabêth.

Death Doth Come (936): Marta
PG-13, Reason for Rating: horrific elements
Romance Partners: n/a
An extending and slight reworking of the Barrow-wight's song.

Prince of Pride (577): Marta
G, Reason for Rating: N/A
Romance Partners: N/A
"Out of the deeps of Ea she came to the aid of Manwe; for Melkor she knew
from before the making of the Music and rejected him, and he hated her, and
feared her more than all others whom Eru made." ("Of the Valar", Valaquenta,
Silmarillion) A sonnet, from Manwë’s POV.

Under the Lonely Mountain Cold (965): Marta
G, Reason for Rating: n/a
Romance Partners: n/a
A dwarf drinking song about the death of Smaug.

Msg# 4704

Re: Races/Places: Villains, Check Ballot #3 Posted by Leaward June 09, 2005 - 16:24:51 Topic ID# 4690
Servant of Elbereth (796) is about an orc ... It doesn't list it in
the sub-categories, but if you want to move it, it could be ... either
way the category works, but I thought I would point it out.

--- In MEFAwards@yahoogroups.com, "Ainaechoiriel" <mefaadmin@e...> wrote:
> Check Ballots for Main Category Races/Places: Villains
>
> Sand Circle, The (49): A L Milton
> G, Reason for Rating: N/A
> Romance Partners: N/A
> A day in the life of Anguo, an oliphaunt trainer. Short vignette in
which
> legends are retold, baths are taken, and feet are scraped.
>
> For Love of Creation (92): Andreth
> PG, Reason for Rating: adult themes
> Romance Partners: Sauron/OFC
> As he stands on the rebuilt tower of Barad-dûr while his armies
prepare to
> leave for Eregion, Annatar/Sauron contemplates the desire for
creation and
> the consequences for those who suffer from it: Fëanor, Morgoth and
Ilúvatar,
> but particularly himself.
>
> Servant of Elbereth (796): Beethoven's 7th
> G, Reason for Rating: n/a
> Romance Partners: n/a
> In Mordor, it is not only Gollum who follows Frodo and Sam ...
>
> Giving Gifts (241): Dwimordene
> G, Reason for Rating: n/a
> Romance Partners: n/a
> A boy of Harad learns a lesson from his father on the proper way to
give the
> most precious of gifts.
>
> Sweet Meat (1073): Ijemanja
> PG-13, Reason for Rating: horrific imagery, adult themes
> Romance Partners: n/a
> "Shelob was gone; and whether she lay long in her lair, nursing her
malice
> and her misery, and in slow years of darkness healed herself from
within,
> rebuilding her clustered eyes, until with hunger like death she spun
once
> more her dreadful snares in the glens of the Mountains of Shadow,
this tale
> does not tell." (LOTR, book IV, chapter X) Here, then, is the untold
tale of
> Shelob after her encounter with Sam. Her hunger is great, but she is
good at
> waiting, and there are many footfalls along her dark tunnels these
days...
>
> Red Fire, Black Blood (1121): just_sphinx
> PG, Reason for Rating: adult themes
> Romance Partners: n/a
> Morgoth reflects in the Void, ever remembering the one who escaped.
> Featuring Morgoth, Maedhros.
>
> Bitter as Willow (801): Nickey
> PG-13, Reason for Rating: For some frightening themes
> Romance Partners: N/A
> Old Man Willow has vengeance within his grasp...
>
> Cornfield, The (530): Tanaqui
> G, Reason for Rating: n/a
> Romance Partners: n/a
> Just why is there a cornfield in the middle of an otherwise very
> English-looking Shire? And how does Frodo get so far ahead of Sam
that Sam
> "loses" him?
>
>
>
> SubCategory: Races/Places: Villains: Drabble
>
> The Men of the South (233): Dwimordene
> PG, Reason for Rating: Generally dark atmosphere
> Romance Partners: none
> The villainy of war is manifold: the final stages of the battle of
Pelennor
> Field.
>
> Alas, Poor Ufthak! (200): Elena Tiriel
> G, Reason for Rating: n/a
> Romance Partners: n/a
> "'D'you remember old Ufthak? We lost him for days. Then we found him
in a
> corner; hanging up he was, but he was wide awake and glaring. How we
> laughed! She'd forgotten him, maybe, but we didn't touch him -- no good
> interfering with [Shelob]' ..." (The Two Towers, "The Choices of Master
> Samwise")
>
> Triumph Incarnate (198): Elena Tiriel
> G, Reason for Rating: n/a
> Romance Partners: n/a
> "And Sauron, sitting in his black seat in the midst of the Temple, had
> laughed when he heard the trumpets of Ar-Pharazôn sounding for
battle; and
> again he had laughed when he heard the thunder of the storm; and a third
> time, even as he laughed at his own thought, thinking what he would
do now
> in the world, being rid of the Edain for ever, he was taken in the
midst of
> his mirth, and his seat and his temple fell into the abyss. But
Sauron was
> not of mortal flesh, and though he was robbed now of that shape in
which he
> had wrought so great an evil ... yet his spirit arose out of the
deep ...
> and came back to Middle-earth...." (The Silmarillion, "Akallabêth")
>
> Orc's Best Friend (384): Forodwaith
> G, Reason for Rating: n/a
> Romance Partners: n/a
> A moment between a warg-rider and his steed.
>
> Roast Mutton (1362): Marta
> G, Reason for Rating: n/a
> Romance Partners: n/a
> Bilbo tries to burgle the trolls.
>
> Nine Riders (791): Rabidsamfan
> G, Reason for Rating: N/A
> Romance Partners: N/A
> A set of nine drabbles, one for each of the Black Riders, exploring
their
> personalities, such as they were...
>
> Long March, The (542): Tanaqui
> G, Reason for Rating: n/a
> Romance Partners: n/a
> The thoughts of one of the Haradrim seen by Sam in Ithilien, just
before the
> Rangers attack.
>
>
>
> SubCategory: Races/Places: Villains: Nazgul
>
> Shadowsong (714): Ellisande
> PG, Reason for Rating: adult themes
> Romance Partners: n/a
> "But the hearts of men are easily corrupted..." Why did Sauron's
corruption
> work so well with men and how much of the man is left after ages in the
> shadow? An attempt to look into the mind of the Lord of the Nazgul.
>
> This Too Shall Pass (742): Isabeau of Greenlea
> G, Reason for Rating: n/a
> Romance Partners: n/a
> An alternate ending to the scene at Osgiliath with Frodo and the Nazgul.
>
> Cursed Queen of Angmar (450): khazar_khum
> R, Reason for Rating: violence, torture, erotic content, mature themes
> Romance Partners: Witch-king/OFC (Ariashal)
> Ariashal of Rhudaur is the unwitting lynchpin of her father's
machinations
> with the Witch-king of Angmar. And she's cursed, too.
>
> Gift of Rule (470): Lyllyn
> PG, Reason for Rating: adult themes
> Romance Partners: n/a
> The thoughts of the Witch-king when the gift was given... and accepted.
>
> Once (485): Meril
> G, Reason for Rating: n/a
> Romance Partners: n/a
> The Lord of the Nazgûl reflects on his mortal life.
>
>
>
> SubCategory: Races/Places: Villains: Orcs
>
> Enmities (561): AmandaK
> PG, Reason for Rating: adult themes
> Romance Partners: n/a
> While men will fight for honor, renown and riches, women have other
reasons
> to fight. A retrospective look at the War of the Ring from an unusual
> viewpoint.
>
> Strange Bedfellows (250): Dwimordene
> PG, Reason for Rating: adult themes
> Romance Partners: n/a
> An incident between the different armies of Orcs, after the attack
on Parth
> Galen.
>
> The Last Stand (76): Soledad
> PG-13, Reason for Rating: Violence and Sexual Encounters
> Romance Partners: N/A
> That famous last fight between Éomer and Uglúk, seen from Uglúk's
> perspective. A feeble attempt to create a glimpse of the culture of the
> Uruk-hai... if there is such thing. I leave the judgement to you, oh
most
> gracious readers.
>
> One Dark Day in Lugbúrz (521): Starlight
> G, Reason for Rating: n/a
> Romance Partners: n/a
> The orcs of Lugburz set Gollum free.
>
> Full Circle (348): Werecat
> PG, Reason for Rating: disturbing images
> Romance Partners: n/a
> "Beasts, they've called us". So end the days of Kolgrun, last
warrior of the
> race of orcs.
>
> Wish upon a star (194): Werecat
> PG-13, Reason for Rating: Rating and warning for violence and disturbing
> subjects, although nothing graphic
> Romance Partners: interspecies (orc/OFC)
> Girl falls to Middle Earth, hoping to meet the object of her desire:
> Legolas. However, things turn quite differently from what she
expected. AU,
> of course. Parody/Black humour.
>
>
>
> SubCategory: Races/Places: Villains: Poetry
>
> Melkor (440): Joan Milligan
> PG, Reason for Rating: adult themes
> Romance Partners: n/a
> Melkor during the Great Music.
>
> Sauron (442): Joan Milligan
> G, Reason for Rating: n/a
> Romance Partners: n/a
> Sauron during the Akallabêth.
>
> Death Doth Come (936): Marta
> PG-13, Reason for Rating: horrific elements
> Romance Partners: n/a
> An extending and slight reworking of the Barrow-wight's song.
>
> Prince of Pride (577): Marta
> G, Reason for Rating: N/A
> Romance Partners: N/A
> "Out of the deeps of Ea she came to the aid of Manwe; for Melkor she
knew
> from before the making of the Music and rejected him, and he hated
her, and
> feared her more than all others whom Eru made." ("Of the Valar",
Valaquenta,
> Silmarillion) A sonnet, from Manwë's POV.
>
> Under the Lonely Mountain Cold (965): Marta
> G, Reason for Rating: n/a
> Romance Partners: n/a
> A dwarf drinking song about the death of Smaug.

Msg# 4719

Re: Races/Places: Villains, Check Ballot #3 Posted by Ainaechoiriel June 10, 2005 - 0:19:05 Topic ID# 4690
Thought about moving it, but then thought about the Author's approval.
Didn't specify Orc as a possible subcategory, summary doesn’t specify....so
it will stay.


--Ainaechoiriel
MEFA Admin and Founder

"This evil cannot be concealed by the power of the Elves," Elrond said, "for
it is Windows-compatible, and freeware at that." --H.F.

http://gabrielle.sytes.net/mefa The Middle-Earth Fanfiction Awards

Blog: http://www.ainaechoiriel.blogspot.com



> -----Original Message-----
> From: MEFAwards@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:MEFAwards@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Leaward
> Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 4:23 PM
> To: MEFAwards@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [MEFAwards] Re: Races/Places: Villains, Check Ballot #3
>
> Servant of Elbereth (796) is about an orc ... It doesn't list
> it in the sub-categories, but if you want to move it, it
> could be ... either way the category works, but I thought I
> would point it out.
>
> --- In MEFAwards@yahoogroups.com, "Ainaechoiriel"
> <mefaadmin@e...> wrote:
> > Check Ballots for Main Category Races/Places: Villains
> >
> > Sand Circle, The (49): A L Milton
> > G, Reason for Rating: N/A
> > Romance Partners: N/A
> > A day in the life of Anguo, an oliphaunt trainer. Short vignette in
> which
> > legends are retold, baths are taken, and feet are scraped.
> >
> > For Love of Creation (92): Andreth
> > PG, Reason for Rating: adult themes
> > Romance Partners: Sauron/OFC
> > As he stands on the rebuilt tower of Barad-dûr while his armies
> prepare to
> > leave for Eregion, Annatar/Sauron contemplates the desire for
> creation and
> > the consequences for those who suffer from it: Fëanor, Morgoth and
> Ilúvatar,
> > but particularly himself.
> >
> > Servant of Elbereth (796): Beethoven's 7th G, Reason for
> Rating: n/a
> > Romance Partners: n/a In Mordor, it is not only Gollum who follows
> > Frodo and Sam ...
> >
> > Giving Gifts (241): Dwimordene
> > G, Reason for Rating: n/a
> > Romance Partners: n/a
> > A boy of Harad learns a lesson from his father on the proper way to
> give the
> > most precious of gifts.
> >
> > Sweet Meat (1073): Ijemanja
> > PG-13, Reason for Rating: horrific imagery, adult themes Romance
> > Partners: n/a "Shelob was gone; and whether she lay long in
> her lair,
> > nursing her
> malice
> > and her misery, and in slow years of darkness healed herself from
> within,
> > rebuilding her clustered eyes, until with hunger like death she spun
> once
> > more her dreadful snares in the glens of the Mountains of Shadow,
> this tale
> > does not tell." (LOTR, book IV, chapter X) Here, then, is the untold
> tale of
> > Shelob after her encounter with Sam. Her hunger is great, but she is
> good at
> > waiting, and there are many footfalls along her dark tunnels these
> days...
> >
> > Red Fire, Black Blood (1121): just_sphinx PG, Reason for
> Rating: adult
> > themes Romance Partners: n/a Morgoth reflects in the Void, ever
> > remembering the one who escaped.
> > Featuring Morgoth, Maedhros.
> >
> > Bitter as Willow (801): Nickey
> > PG-13, Reason for Rating: For some frightening themes Romance
> > Partners: N/A Old Man Willow has vengeance within his grasp...
> >
> > Cornfield, The (530): Tanaqui
> > G, Reason for Rating: n/a
> > Romance Partners: n/a
> > Just why is there a cornfield in the middle of an otherwise very
> > English-looking Shire? And how does Frodo get so far ahead of Sam
> that Sam
> > "loses" him?
> >
> >
> >
> > SubCategory: Races/Places: Villains: Drabble
> >
> > The Men of the South (233): Dwimordene PG, Reason for Rating:
> > Generally dark atmosphere Romance Partners: none The
> villainy of war
> > is manifold: the final stages of the battle of
> Pelennor
> > Field.
> >
> > Alas, Poor Ufthak! (200): Elena Tiriel G, Reason for Rating: n/a
> > Romance Partners: n/a "'D'you remember old Ufthak? We lost him for
> > days. Then we found him
> in a
> > corner; hanging up he was, but he was wide awake and
> glaring. How we
> > laughed! She'd forgotten him, maybe, but we didn't touch him -- no
> > good interfering with [Shelob]' ..." (The Two Towers, "The
> Choices of
> > Master
> > Samwise")
> >
> > Triumph Incarnate (198): Elena Tiriel
> > G, Reason for Rating: n/a
> > Romance Partners: n/a
> > "And Sauron, sitting in his black seat in the midst of the
> Temple, had
> > laughed when he heard the trumpets of Ar-Pharazôn sounding for
> battle; and
> > again he had laughed when he heard the thunder of the storm; and a
> > third time, even as he laughed at his own thought, thinking what he
> > would
> do now
> > in the world, being rid of the Edain for ever, he was taken in the
> midst of
> > his mirth, and his seat and his temple fell into the abyss. But
> Sauron was
> > not of mortal flesh, and though he was robbed now of that shape in
> which he
> > had wrought so great an evil ... yet his spirit arose out of the
> deep ...
> > and came back to Middle-earth...." (The Silmarillion, "Akallabêth")
> >
> > Orc's Best Friend (384): Forodwaith
> > G, Reason for Rating: n/a
> > Romance Partners: n/a
> > A moment between a warg-rider and his steed.
> >
> > Roast Mutton (1362): Marta
> > G, Reason for Rating: n/a
> > Romance Partners: n/a
> > Bilbo tries to burgle the trolls.
> >
> > Nine Riders (791): Rabidsamfan
> > G, Reason for Rating: N/A
> > Romance Partners: N/A
> > A set of nine drabbles, one for each of the Black Riders, exploring
> their
> > personalities, such as they were...
> >
> > Long March, The (542): Tanaqui
> > G, Reason for Rating: n/a
> > Romance Partners: n/a
> > The thoughts of one of the Haradrim seen by Sam in Ithilien, just
> before the
> > Rangers attack.
> >
> >
> >
> > SubCategory: Races/Places: Villains: Nazgul
> >
> > Shadowsong (714): Ellisande
> > PG, Reason for Rating: adult themes
> > Romance Partners: n/a
> > "But the hearts of men are easily corrupted..." Why did Sauron's
> corruption
> > work so well with men and how much of the man is left after ages in
> > the shadow? An attempt to look into the mind of the Lord of
> the Nazgul.
> >
> > This Too Shall Pass (742): Isabeau of Greenlea G, Reason
> for Rating:
> > n/a Romance Partners: n/a An alternate ending to the scene at
> > Osgiliath with Frodo and the Nazgul.
> >
> > Cursed Queen of Angmar (450): khazar_khum R, Reason for Rating:
> > violence, torture, erotic content, mature themes Romance Partners:
> > Witch-king/OFC (Ariashal) Ariashal of Rhudaur is the unwitting
> > lynchpin of her father's
> machinations
> > with the Witch-king of Angmar. And she's cursed, too.
> >
> > Gift of Rule (470): Lyllyn
> > PG, Reason for Rating: adult themes
> > Romance Partners: n/a
> > The thoughts of the Witch-king when the gift was given...
> and accepted.
> >
> > Once (485): Meril
> > G, Reason for Rating: n/a
> > Romance Partners: n/a
> > The Lord of the Nazgûl reflects on his mortal life.
> >
> >
> >
> > SubCategory: Races/Places: Villains: Orcs
> >
> > Enmities (561): AmandaK
> > PG, Reason for Rating: adult themes
> > Romance Partners: n/a
> > While men will fight for honor, renown and riches, women have other
> reasons
> > to fight. A retrospective look at the War of the Ring from
> an unusual
> > viewpoint.
> >
> > Strange Bedfellows (250): Dwimordene
> > PG, Reason for Rating: adult themes
> > Romance Partners: n/a
> > An incident between the different armies of Orcs, after the attack
> on Parth
> > Galen.
> >
> > The Last Stand (76): Soledad
> > PG-13, Reason for Rating: Violence and Sexual Encounters Romance
> > Partners: N/A That famous last fight between Éomer and Uglúk, seen
> > from Uglúk's perspective. A feeble attempt to create a
> glimpse of the
> > culture of the Uruk-hai... if there is such thing. I leave the
> > judgement to you, oh
> most
> > gracious readers.
> >
> > One Dark Day in Lugbúrz (521): Starlight G, Reason for Rating: n/a
> > Romance Partners: n/a The orcs of Lugburz set Gollum free.
> >
> > Full Circle (348): Werecat
> > PG, Reason for Rating: disturbing images Romance Partners: n/a
> > "Beasts, they've called us". So end the days of Kolgrun, last
> warrior of the
> > race of orcs.
> >
> > Wish upon a star (194): Werecat
> > PG-13, Reason for Rating: Rating and warning for violence and
> > disturbing subjects, although nothing graphic Romance Partners:
> > interspecies (orc/OFC) Girl falls to Middle Earth, hoping
> to meet the
> > object of her desire:
> > Legolas. However, things turn quite differently from what she
> expected. AU,
> > of course. Parody/Black humour.
> >
> >
> >
> > SubCategory: Races/Places: Villains: Poetry
> >
> > Melkor (440): Joan Milligan
> > PG, Reason for Rating: adult themes
> > Romance Partners: n/a
> > Melkor during the Great Music.
> >
> > Sauron (442): Joan Milligan
> > G, Reason for Rating: n/a
> > Romance Partners: n/a
> > Sauron during the Akallabêth.
> >
> > Death Doth Come (936): Marta
> > PG-13, Reason for Rating: horrific elements Romance
> Partners: n/a An
> > extending and slight reworking of the Barrow-wight's song.
> >
> > Prince of Pride (577): Marta
> > G, Reason for Rating: N/A
> > Romance Partners: N/A
> > "Out of the deeps of Ea she came to the aid of Manwe; for Melkor she
> knew
> > from before the making of the Music and rejected him, and he hated
> her, and
> > feared her more than all others whom Eru made." ("Of the Valar",
> Valaquenta,
> > Silmarillion) A sonnet, from Manwë's POV.
> >
> > Under the Lonely Mountain Cold (965): Marta G, Reason for
> Rating: n/a
> > Romance Partners: n/a A dwarf drinking song about the death
> of Smaug.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> --------------------~--> In low income neighborhoods, 84% do
> not own computers.
> At Network for Good, help bridge the Digital Divide!
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/S.QlOD/3MnJAA/Zx0JAA/wx3olB/TM
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ------~->
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>

Msg# 4762

Re: Races/Places: Villains, Check Ballot #3 Posted by Leaward June 10, 2005 - 7:19:51 Topic ID# 4690
That's fine, I didn't say it had to be moved, I just wasn't sure if
you did want all Orc stories together or not. It's fine where it is.

From the very start the whole 'categorizing' idea has been confusing
to me, and I'm really glad I didn't volunteer to be a categorizer.
I've watched what you guys have gone through to do this and know the
stress you're under. But for the post-mortem, perhaps we could
discuss that a better description could be added to the author
nomination letter or rules or whatever about how important the
sub-category is. To me, since the sub-category section came beneath
the main category sections, I thought that came AFTER the first three
choices and so it was more of a throw-away item only to be used if the
first three weren't viable. And there were no guidelines as to what
type of sub-categories should be suggested -- for instance, though I
could guess Mirkwood or Lothlorien or Rohan might be sub-categories, I
would never have guessed to have put 'Grey Company' in as a
sub-category, yet one has been created. And though I personally have
two Grey Company stories, only one got put in the Grey Company
category. They're fine with me where they are but a lot of the
category moves looks rather ... arbitrary and inconsistent. I'm not
criticizing, I'm just saying I find the whole process confusing. (And
as an author liaison, I got to see a lot of the behind-the-scenes
stuff that has been going on.)

(I still don't understand how novels of 50,000+ words have to compete
with short 1,000 word stories ... it wouldn't happen that way in a
regular competition ... Why do we have to say the story length anyway
since other than Drabbles that category seems to have been ignored?)

Lea

--- In MEFAwards@yahoogroups.com, "Ainaechoiriel" <mefaadmin@e...> wrote:
> Thought about moving it, but then thought about the Author's approval.
> Didn't specify Orc as a possible subcategory, summary doesn't
specify....so
> it will stay.
>
>
> --Ainaechoiriel
> MEFA Admin and Founder
>
> "This evil cannot be concealed by the power of the Elves," Elrond
said, "for
> it is Windows-compatible, and freeware at that." --H.F.
>
> http://gabrielle.sytes.net/mefa The Middle-Earth Fanfiction Awards
>
> Blog: http://www.ainaechoiriel.blogspot.com
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: MEFAwards@yahoogroups.com
> > [mailto:MEFAwards@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Leaward
> > Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 4:23 PM
> > To: MEFAwards@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [MEFAwards] Re: Races/Places: Villains, Check Ballot #3
> >
> > Servant of Elbereth (796) is about an orc ... It doesn't list
> > it in the sub-categories, but if you want to move it, it
> > could be ... either way the category works, but I thought I
> > would point it out.
> >
> > --- In MEFAwards@yahoogroups.com, "Ainaechoiriel"
> > <mefaadmin@e...> wrote:
> > > Check Ballots for Main Category Races/Places: Villains
> > >
> > > Sand Circle, The (49): A L Milton
> > > G, Reason for Rating: N/A
> > > Romance Partners: N/A
> > > A day in the life of Anguo, an oliphaunt trainer. Short vignette in
> > which
> > > legends are retold, baths are taken, and feet are scraped.
> > >
> > > For Love of Creation (92): Andreth
> > > PG, Reason for Rating: adult themes
> > > Romance Partners: Sauron/OFC
> > > As he stands on the rebuilt tower of Barad-dûr while his armies
> > prepare to
> > > leave for Eregion, Annatar/Sauron contemplates the desire for
> > creation and
> > > the consequences for those who suffer from it: Fëanor, Morgoth and
> > Ilúvatar,
> > > but particularly himself.
> > >
> > > Servant of Elbereth (796): Beethoven's 7th G, Reason for
> > Rating: n/a
> > > Romance Partners: n/a In Mordor, it is not only Gollum who follows
> > > Frodo and Sam ...
> > >
> > > Giving Gifts (241): Dwimordene
> > > G, Reason for Rating: n/a
> > > Romance Partners: n/a
> > > A boy of Harad learns a lesson from his father on the proper way to
> > give the
> > > most precious of gifts.
> > >
> > > Sweet Meat (1073): Ijemanja
> > > PG-13, Reason for Rating: horrific imagery, adult themes Romance
> > > Partners: n/a "Shelob was gone; and whether she lay long in
> > her lair,
> > > nursing her
> > malice
> > > and her misery, and in slow years of darkness healed herself from
> > within,
> > > rebuilding her clustered eyes, until with hunger like death she spun
> > once
> > > more her dreadful snares in the glens of the Mountains of Shadow,
> > this tale
> > > does not tell." (LOTR, book IV, chapter X) Here, then, is the untold
> > tale of
> > > Shelob after her encounter with Sam. Her hunger is great, but she is
> > good at
> > > waiting, and there are many footfalls along her dark tunnels these
> > days...
> > >
> > > Red Fire, Black Blood (1121): just_sphinx PG, Reason for
> > Rating: adult
> > > themes Romance Partners: n/a Morgoth reflects in the Void, ever
> > > remembering the one who escaped.
> > > Featuring Morgoth, Maedhros.
> > >
> > > Bitter as Willow (801): Nickey
> > > PG-13, Reason for Rating: For some frightening themes Romance
> > > Partners: N/A Old Man Willow has vengeance within his grasp...
> > >
> > > Cornfield, The (530): Tanaqui
> > > G, Reason for Rating: n/a
> > > Romance Partners: n/a
> > > Just why is there a cornfield in the middle of an otherwise very
> > > English-looking Shire? And how does Frodo get so far ahead of Sam
> > that Sam
> > > "loses" him?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > SubCategory: Races/Places: Villains: Drabble
> > >
> > > The Men of the South (233): Dwimordene PG, Reason for Rating:
> > > Generally dark atmosphere Romance Partners: none The
> > villainy of war
> > > is manifold: the final stages of the battle of
> > Pelennor
> > > Field.
> > >
> > > Alas, Poor Ufthak! (200): Elena Tiriel G, Reason for Rating: n/a
> > > Romance Partners: n/a "'D'you remember old Ufthak? We lost him for
> > > days. Then we found him
> > in a
> > > corner; hanging up he was, but he was wide awake and
> > glaring. How we
> > > laughed! She'd forgotten him, maybe, but we didn't touch him -- no
> > > good interfering with [Shelob]' ..." (The Two Towers, "The
> > Choices of
> > > Master
> > > Samwise")
> > >
> > > Triumph Incarnate (198): Elena Tiriel
> > > G, Reason for Rating: n/a
> > > Romance Partners: n/a
> > > "And Sauron, sitting in his black seat in the midst of the
> > Temple, had
> > > laughed when he heard the trumpets of Ar-Pharazôn sounding for
> > battle; and
> > > again he had laughed when he heard the thunder of the storm; and a
> > > third time, even as he laughed at his own thought, thinking what he
> > > would
> > do now
> > > in the world, being rid of the Edain for ever, he was taken in the
> > midst of
> > > his mirth, and his seat and his temple fell into the abyss. But
> > Sauron was
> > > not of mortal flesh, and though he was robbed now of that shape in
> > which he
> > > had wrought so great an evil ... yet his spirit arose out of the
> > deep ...
> > > and came back to Middle-earth...." (The Silmarillion, "Akallabêth")
> > >
> > > Orc's Best Friend (384): Forodwaith
> > > G, Reason for Rating: n/a
> > > Romance Partners: n/a
> > > A moment between a warg-rider and his steed.
> > >
> > > Roast Mutton (1362): Marta
> > > G, Reason for Rating: n/a
> > > Romance Partners: n/a
> > > Bilbo tries to burgle the trolls.
> > >
> > > Nine Riders (791): Rabidsamfan
> > > G, Reason for Rating: N/A
> > > Romance Partners: N/A
> > > A set of nine drabbles, one for each of the Black Riders, exploring
> > their
> > > personalities, such as they were...
> > >
> > > Long March, The (542): Tanaqui
> > > G, Reason for Rating: n/a
> > > Romance Partners: n/a
> > > The thoughts of one of the Haradrim seen by Sam in Ithilien, just
> > before the
> > > Rangers attack.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > SubCategory: Races/Places: Villains: Nazgul
> > >
> > > Shadowsong (714): Ellisande
> > > PG, Reason for Rating: adult themes
> > > Romance Partners: n/a
> > > "But the hearts of men are easily corrupted..." Why did Sauron's
> > corruption
> > > work so well with men and how much of the man is left after ages in
> > > the shadow? An attempt to look into the mind of the Lord of
> > the Nazgul.
> > >
> > > This Too Shall Pass (742): Isabeau of Greenlea G, Reason
> > for Rating:
> > > n/a Romance Partners: n/a An alternate ending to the scene at
> > > Osgiliath with Frodo and the Nazgul.
> > >
> > > Cursed Queen of Angmar (450): khazar_khum R, Reason for Rating:
> > > violence, torture, erotic content, mature themes Romance Partners:
> > > Witch-king/OFC (Ariashal) Ariashal of Rhudaur is the unwitting
> > > lynchpin of her father's
> > machinations
> > > with the Witch-king of Angmar. And she's cursed, too.
> > >
> > > Gift of Rule (470): Lyllyn
> > > PG, Reason for Rating: adult themes
> > > Romance Partners: n/a
> > > The thoughts of the Witch-king when the gift was given...
> > and accepted.
> > >
> > > Once (485): Meril
> > > G, Reason for Rating: n/a
> > > Romance Partners: n/a
> > > The Lord of the Nazgûl reflects on his mortal life.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > SubCategory: Races/Places: Villains: Orcs
> > >
> > > Enmities (561): AmandaK
> > > PG, Reason for Rating: adult themes
> > > Romance Partners: n/a
> > > While men will fight for honor, renown and riches, women have other
> > reasons
> > > to fight. A retrospective look at the War of the Ring from
> > an unusual
> > > viewpoint.
> > >
> > > Strange Bedfellows (250): Dwimordene
> > > PG, Reason for Rating: adult themes
> > > Romance Partners: n/a
> > > An incident between the different armies of Orcs, after the attack
> > on Parth
> > > Galen.
> > >
> > > The Last Stand (76): Soledad
> > > PG-13, Reason for Rating: Violence and Sexual Encounters Romance
> > > Partners: N/A That famous last fight between Éomer and Uglúk, seen
> > > from Uglúk's perspective. A feeble attempt to create a
> > glimpse of the
> > > culture of the Uruk-hai... if there is such thing. I leave the
> > > judgement to you, oh
> > most
> > > gracious readers.
> > >
> > > One Dark Day in Lugbúrz (521): Starlight G, Reason for Rating: n/a
> > > Romance Partners: n/a The orcs of Lugburz set Gollum free.
> > >
> > > Full Circle (348): Werecat
> > > PG, Reason for Rating: disturbing images Romance Partners: n/a
> > > "Beasts, they've called us". So end the days of Kolgrun, last
> > warrior of the
> > > race of orcs.
> > >
> > > Wish upon a star (194): Werecat
> > > PG-13, Reason for Rating: Rating and warning for violence and
> > > disturbing subjects, although nothing graphic Romance Partners:
> > > interspecies (orc/OFC) Girl falls to Middle Earth, hoping
> > to meet the
> > > object of her desire:
> > > Legolas. However, things turn quite differently from what she
> > expected. AU,
> > > of course. Parody/Black humour.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > SubCategory: Races/Places: Villains: Poetry
> > >
> > > Melkor (440): Joan Milligan
> > > PG, Reason for Rating: adult themes
> > > Romance Partners: n/a
> > > Melkor during the Great Music.
> > >
> > > Sauron (442): Joan Milligan
> > > G, Reason for Rating: n/a
> > > Romance Partners: n/a
> > > Sauron during the Akallabêth.
> > >
> > > Death Doth Come (936): Marta
> > > PG-13, Reason for Rating: horrific elements Romance
> > Partners: n/a An
> > > extending and slight reworking of the Barrow-wight's song.
> > >
> > > Prince of Pride (577): Marta
> > > G, Reason for Rating: N/A
> > > Romance Partners: N/A
> > > "Out of the deeps of Ea she came to the aid of Manwe; for Melkor she
> > knew
> > > from before the making of the Music and rejected him, and he hated
> > her, and
> > > feared her more than all others whom Eru made." ("Of the Valar",
> > Valaquenta,
> > > Silmarillion) A sonnet, from Manwë's POV.
> > >
> > > Under the Lonely Mountain Cold (965): Marta G, Reason for
> > Rating: n/a
> > > Romance Partners: n/a A dwarf drinking song about the death
> > of Smaug.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > --------------------~--> In low income neighborhoods, 84% do
> > not own computers.
> > At Network for Good, help bridge the Digital Divide!
> > http://us.click.yahoo.com/S.QlOD/3MnJAA/Zx0JAA/wx3olB/TM
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > ------~->
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >

Msg# 4766

Re: Races/Places: Villains, Check Ballot #3 Posted by C Dodd June 10, 2005 - 8:27:06 Topic ID# 4690
From an author point of view the category/subcategory thing was
confusing for me too, and some of that came up because drabbles get
split out twice, once as a story type and once as a subcategory.

Now I figure that you pulled out drabbles for the same reason that you
pulled out poetry, particularly since (thank you!) you have been
strict about the definition. And as a drabble writer, I like the
notion of drabbles competing with drabbles. But at the same time I
felt like my drabble series "Nine Riders" was about the Nazgul and
once I knew that the subcategory "Nazgul" existed (which I didn't,
until the check ballot stage) I could see that it belonged just as
much in that subcategory as it did the drabble subcategory.

While it was in the nomination phase, I did suggest a subcategory of
"character exposition" for that story which was not picked up because
a) no one else knew about it and b) it wasn't very good. If I'd known
there was a subcategory for the Nazgul I'd have used it, but I didn't
know where to look for a list of subcategories, and even if I had
known, my understanding was limited and I thought that the
subcategories had to be more encompassing than that.

Thing is, I'm a librarian. I know that all categorization schemes are
arbitrary. (Even alphabetization can vary according to some
arbitrary choices.) The minute we start putting things in a hierarchy
some considerations are going to be left by the wayside and other
considerations are going to take on an inflated priority. When you
throw category viability based on numbers into the mix, it's bound to
mean some clipped corners as pegs are fit into holes.

So I pretty much just accepted what I've been told, and am ready to
run with that...



(But, darn it, now I've got me *another* postmortem discussion idea.
Oh, Marta...!)





On 6/10/05, Leaward <leaward_l@yahoo.com> wrote:
> That's fine, I didn't say it had to be moved, I just wasn't sure if
> you did want all Orc stories together or not. It's fine where it is.
>
> From the very start the whole 'categorizing' idea has been confusing
> to me, and I'm really glad I didn't volunteer to be a categorizer.
> I've watched what you guys have gone through to do this and know the
> stress you're under. But for the post-mortem, perhaps we could
> discuss that a better description could be added to the author
> nomination letter or rules or whatever about how important the
> sub-category is. To me, since the sub-category section came beneath
> the main category sections, I thought that came AFTER the first three
> choices and so it was more of a throw-away item only to be used if the
> first three weren't viable. And there were no guidelines as to what
> type of sub-categories should be suggested -- for instance, though I
> could guess Mirkwood or Lothlorien or Rohan might be sub-categories, I
> would never have guessed to have put 'Grey Company' in as a
> sub-category, yet one has been created. And though I personally have
> two Grey Company stories, only one got put in the Grey Company
> category. They're fine with me where they are but a lot of the
> category moves looks rather ... arbitrary and inconsistent. I'm not
> criticizing, I'm just saying I find the whole process confusing. (And
> as an author liaison, I got to see a lot of the behind-the-scenes
> stuff that has been going on.)
>
> (I still don't understand how novels of 50,000+ words have to compete
> with short 1,000 word stories ... it wouldn't happen that way in a
> regular competition ... Why do we have to say the story length anyway
> since other than Drabbles that category seems to have been ignored?)
>
> Lea
>
>
> --- In MEFAwards@yahoogroups.com, "Ainaechoiriel" <mefaadmin@e...> wrote:
> > Thought about moving it, but then thought about the Author's approval.
> > Didn't specify Orc as a possible subcategory, summary doesn't
> specify....so
> > it will stay.
> >
> >
> > --Ainaechoiriel
> > MEFA Admin and Founder
> >
> > "This evil cannot be concealed by the power of the Elves," Elrond
> said, "for
> > it is Windows-compatible, and freeware at that." --H.F.
> >
> > http://gabrielle.sytes.net/mefa The Middle-Earth Fanfiction Awards
> >
> > Blog: http://www.ainaechoiriel.blogspot.com
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: MEFAwards@yahoogroups.com
> > > [mailto:MEFAwards@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Leaward
> > > Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 4:23 PM
> > > To: MEFAwards@yahoogroups.com
> > > Subject: [MEFAwards] Re: Races/Places: Villains, Check Ballot #3
> > >
> > > Servant of Elbereth (796) is about an orc ... It doesn't list
> > > it in the sub-categories, but if you want to move it, it
> > > could be ... either way the category works, but I thought I
> > > would point it out.
> > >
> > > --- In MEFAwards@yahoogroups.com, "Ainaechoiriel"
> > > <mefaadmin@e...> wrote:
> > > > Check Ballots for Main Category Races/Places: Villains
> > > >
> > > > Sand Circle, The (49): A L Milton
> > > > G, Reason for Rating: N/A
> > > > Romance Partners: N/A
> > > > A day in the life of Anguo, an oliphaunt trainer. Short vignette in
> > > which
> > > > legends are retold, baths are taken, and feet are scraped.
> > > >
> > > > For Love of Creation (92): Andreth
> > > > PG, Reason for Rating: adult themes
> > > > Romance Partners: Sauron/OFC
> > > > As he stands on the rebuilt tower of Barad-dûr while his armies
> > > prepare to
> > > > leave for Eregion, Annatar/Sauron contemplates the desire for
> > > creation and
> > > > the consequences for those who suffer from it: Fëanor, Morgoth and
> > > Ilúvatar,
> > > > but particularly himself.
> > > >
> > > > Servant of Elbereth (796): Beethoven's 7th G, Reason for
> > > Rating: n/a
> > > > Romance Partners: n/a In Mordor, it is not only Gollum who follows
> > > > Frodo and Sam ...
> > > >
> > > > Giving Gifts (241): Dwimordene
> > > > G, Reason for Rating: n/a
> > > > Romance Partners: n/a
> > > > A boy of Harad learns a lesson from his father on the proper way to
> > > give the
> > > > most precious of gifts.
> > > >
> > > > Sweet Meat (1073): Ijemanja
> > > > PG-13, Reason for Rating: horrific imagery, adult themes Romance
> > > > Partners: n/a "Shelob was gone; and whether she lay long in
> > > her lair,
> > > > nursing her
> > > malice
> > > > and her misery, and in slow years of darkness healed herself from
> > > within,
> > > > rebuilding her clustered eyes, until with hunger like death she spun
> > > once
> > > > more her dreadful snares in the glens of the Mountains of Shadow,
> > > this tale
> > > > does not tell." (LOTR, book IV, chapter X) Here, then, is the untold
> > > tale of
> > > > Shelob after her encounter with Sam. Her hunger is great, but she is
> > > good at
> > > > waiting, and there are many footfalls along her dark tunnels these
> > > days...
> > > >
> > > > Red Fire, Black Blood (1121): just_sphinx PG, Reason for
> > > Rating: adult
> > > > themes Romance Partners: n/a Morgoth reflects in the Void, ever
> > > > remembering the one who escaped.
> > > > Featuring Morgoth, Maedhros.
> > > >
> > > > Bitter as Willow (801): Nickey
> > > > PG-13, Reason for Rating: For some frightening themes Romance
> > > > Partners: N/A Old Man Willow has vengeance within his grasp...
> > > >
> > > > Cornfield, The (530): Tanaqui
> > > > G, Reason for Rating: n/a
> > > > Romance Partners: n/a
> > > > Just why is there a cornfield in the middle of an otherwise very
> > > > English-looking Shire? And how does Frodo get so far ahead of Sam
> > > that Sam
> > > > "loses" him?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > SubCategory: Races/Places: Villains: Drabble
> > > >
> > > > The Men of the South (233): Dwimordene PG, Reason for Rating:
> > > > Generally dark atmosphere Romance Partners: none The
> > > villainy of war
> > > > is manifold: the final stages of the battle of
> > > Pelennor
> > > > Field.
> > > >
> > > > Alas, Poor Ufthak! (200): Elena Tiriel G, Reason for Rating: n/a
> > > > Romance Partners: n/a "'D'you remember old Ufthak? We lost him for
> > > > days. Then we found him
> > > in a
> > > > corner; hanging up he was, but he was wide awake and
> > > glaring. How we
> > > > laughed! She'd forgotten him, maybe, but we didn't touch him -- no
> > > > good interfering with [Shelob]' ..." (The Two Towers, "The
> > > Choices of
> > > > Master
> > > > Samwise")
> > > >
> > > > Triumph Incarnate (198): Elena Tiriel
> > > > G, Reason for Rating: n/a
> > > > Romance Partners: n/a
> > > > "And Sauron, sitting in his black seat in the midst of the
> > > Temple, had
> > > > laughed when he heard the trumpets of Ar-Pharazôn sounding for
> > > battle; and
> > > > again he had laughed when he heard the thunder of the storm; and a
> > > > third time, even as he laughed at his own thought, thinking what he
> > > > would
> > > do now
> > > > in the world, being rid of the Edain for ever, he was taken in the
> > > midst of
> > > > his mirth, and his seat and his temple fell into the abyss. But
> > > Sauron was
> > > > not of mortal flesh, and though he was robbed now of that shape in
> > > which he
> > > > had wrought so great an evil ... yet his spirit arose out of the
> > > deep ...
> > > > and came back to Middle-earth...." (The Silmarillion, "Akallabêth")
> > > >
> > > > Orc's Best Friend (384): Forodwaith
> > > > G, Reason for Rating: n/a
> > > > Romance Partners: n/a
> > > > A moment between a warg-rider and his steed.
> > > >
> > > > Roast Mutton (1362): Marta
> > > > G, Reason for Rating: n/a
> > > > Romance Partners: n/a
> > > > Bilbo tries to burgle the trolls.
> > > >
> > > > Nine Riders (791): Rabidsamfan
> > > > G, Reason for Rating: N/A
> > > > Romance Partners: N/A
> > > > A set of nine drabbles, one for each of the Black Riders, exploring
> > > their
> > > > personalities, such as they were...
> > > >
> > > > Long March, The (542): Tanaqui
> > > > G, Reason for Rating: n/a
> > > > Romance Partners: n/a
> > > > The thoughts of one of the Haradrim seen by Sam in Ithilien, just
> > > before the
> > > > Rangers attack.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > SubCategory: Races/Places: Villains: Nazgul
> > > >
> > > > Shadowsong (714): Ellisande
> > > > PG, Reason for Rating: adult themes
> > > > Romance Partners: n/a
> > > > "But the hearts of men are easily corrupted..." Why did Sauron's
> > > corruption
> > > > work so well with men and how much of the man is left after ages in
> > > > the shadow? An attempt to look into the mind of the Lord of
> > > the Nazgul.
> > > >
> > > > This Too Shall Pass (742): Isabeau of Greenlea G, Reason
> > > for Rating:
> > > > n/a Romance Partners: n/a An alternate ending to the scene at
> > > > Osgiliath with Frodo and the Nazgul.
> > > >
> > > > Cursed Queen of Angmar (450): khazar_khum R, Reason for Rating:
> > > > violence, torture, erotic content, mature themes Romance Partners:
> > > > Witch-king/OFC (Ariashal) Ariashal of Rhudaur is the unwitting
> > > > lynchpin of her father's
> > > machinations
> > > > with the Witch-king of Angmar. And she's cursed, too.
> > > >
> > > > Gift of Rule (470): Lyllyn
> > > > PG, Reason for Rating: adult themes
> > > > Romance Partners: n/a
> > > > The thoughts of the Witch-king when the gift was given...
> > > and accepted.
> > > >
> > > > Once (485): Meril
> > > > G, Reason for Rating: n/a
> > > > Romance Partners: n/a
> > > > The Lord of the Nazgûl reflects on his mortal life.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > SubCategory: Races/Places: Villains: Orcs
> > > >
> > > > Enmities (561): AmandaK
> > > > PG, Reason for Rating: adult themes
> > > > Romance Partners: n/a
> > > > While men will fight for honor, renown and riches, women have other
> > > reasons
> > > > to fight. A retrospective look at the War of the Ring from
> > > an unusual
> > > > viewpoint.
> > > >
> > > > Strange Bedfellows (250): Dwimordene
> > > > PG, Reason for Rating: adult themes
> > > > Romance Partners: n/a
> > > > An incident between the different armies of Orcs, after the attack
> > > on Parth
> > > > Galen.
> > > >
> > > > The Last Stand (76): Soledad
> > > > PG-13, Reason for Rating: Violence and Sexual Encounters Romance
> > > > Partners: N/A That famous last fight between Éomer and Uglúk, seen
> > > > from Uglúk's perspective. A feeble attempt to create a
> > > glimpse of the
> > > > culture of the Uruk-hai... if there is such thing. I leave the
> > > > judgement to you, oh
> > > most
> > > > gracious readers.
> > > >
> > > > One Dark Day in Lugbúrz (521): Starlight G, Reason for Rating: n/a
> > > > Romance Partners: n/a The orcs of Lugburz set Gollum free.
> > > >
> > > > Full Circle (348): Werecat
> > > > PG, Reason for Rating: disturbing images Romance Partners: n/a
> > > > "Beasts, they've called us". So end the days of Kolgrun, last
> > > warrior of the
> > > > race of orcs.
> > > >
> > > > Wish upon a star (194): Werecat
> > > > PG-13, Reason for Rating: Rating and warning for violence and
> > > > disturbing subjects, although nothing graphic Romance Partners:
> > > > interspecies (orc/OFC) Girl falls to Middle Earth, hoping
> > > to meet the
> > > > object of her desire:
> > > > Legolas. However, things turn quite differently from what she
> > > expected. AU,
> > > > of course. Parody/Black humour.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > SubCategory: Races/Places: Villains: Poetry
> > > >
> > > > Melkor (440): Joan Milligan
> > > > PG, Reason for Rating: adult themes
> > > > Romance Partners: n/a
> > > > Melkor during the Great Music.
> > > >
> > > > Sauron (442): Joan Milligan
> > > > G, Reason for Rating: n/a
> > > > Romance Partners: n/a
> > > > Sauron during the Akallabêth.
> > > >
> > > > Death Doth Come (936): Marta
> > > > PG-13, Reason for Rating: horrific elements Romance
> > > Partners: n/a An
> > > > extending and slight reworking of the Barrow-wight's song.
> > > >
> > > > Prince of Pride (577): Marta
> > > > G, Reason for Rating: N/A
> > > > Romance Partners: N/A
> > > > "Out of the deeps of Ea she came to the aid of Manwe; for Melkor she
> > > knew
> > > > from before the making of the Music and rejected him, and he hated
> > > her, and
> > > > feared her more than all others whom Eru made." ("Of the Valar",
> > > Valaquenta,
> > > > Silmarillion) A sonnet, from Manwë's POV.
> > > >
> > > > Under the Lonely Mountain Cold (965): Marta G, Reason for
> > > Rating: n/a
> > > > Romance Partners: n/a A dwarf drinking song about the death
> > > of Smaug.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > > --------------------~--> In low income neighborhoods, 84% do
> > > not own computers.
> > > At Network for Good, help bridge the Digital Divide!
> > >
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/S.QlOD/3MnJAA/Zx0JAA/wx3olB/TM
> > >
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> > > ------~->
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MEFAwards/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> MEFAwards-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Msg# 4768

Re: Races/Places: Villains, Check Ballot #3 Posted by Marta Layton June 10, 2005 - 8:27:18 Topic ID# 4690
On 10 Jun 2005, at 08:19, Leaward wrote:

> That's fine, I didn't say it had to be moved, I just wasn't sure if
> you did want all Orc stories together or not.  It's fine where it is.
>
> From the very start the whole 'categorizing' idea has been confusing
> to me, and I'm really glad I didn't volunteer to be a categorizer.
> I've watched what you guys have gone through to do this and know the
> stress you're under.  But for the post-mortem, perhaps we could
> discuss that a better description could be added to the author
> nomination letter or rules or whatever about how important the
> sub-category is.  To me, since the sub-category section came beneath
> the main category sections, I thought that came AFTER the first three
> choices and so it was more of a throw-away item only to be used if the
> first three weren't viable. And there were no guidelines as to what
> type of sub-categories should be suggested -- for instance, though I
> could guess Mirkwood or Lothlorien or Rohan might be sub-categories, I
> would never have guessed to have put 'Grey Company' in as a
> sub-category, yet one has been created.  And though I personally have
> two Grey Company stories, only one got put in the Grey Company
> category. They're fine with me where they are but a lot of the
> category moves looks rather ... arbitrary and inconsistent.  I'm not
> criticizing, I'm just saying I find the whole process confusing.  (And
> as an author liaison, I got to see a lot of the behind-the-scenes
> stuff that has been going on.)
>

That's a good idea. I have talked to several people, and it's a pretty
fairly common complaint that the categorising process is either
"confusing" or "overwhelming". I haven't had any suggestions about how
to improve it, though, so if you or anyone else have ideas that's a
first-rate idea. We'll discuss it in the post mortem, definitely.

> (I still don't understand how novels of 50,000+ words have to compete
> with short 1,000 word stories ... it wouldn't happen that way in a
> regular competition ...  Why do we have to say the story length anyway
> since other than Drabbles that category seems to have been ignored?)
>

Well, part of it is just for the readers' information. Last year in the
post mortem I suggested that we make longer stories run in their own
subcategories like drabbles have to, since I agree that it's hard for
one to compete the other. But last year it was decided that they
wouldn't be a mandatory subcategory. Feel free to bring it up next
year, as we may need to re-evaluate!

I also made one subcategory for longer stories. You'll notice that Gr:
Adventure has a "Long Form" subcategory. This is all epics, novels, and
novellas. I tried to make that subcategory in my other category, but
for some reason or other it didn't work out. And I did suggest that
other categorisers try to do the same thing, but that was completely at
their discretion.

Marta
*****
Home is where you hang your @.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Msg# 4769

Re: Races/Places: Villains, Check Ballot #3 Posted by rhapsody\_the\_bard June 10, 2005 - 8:41:30 Topic ID# 4690
--- In MEFAwards@yahoogroups.com, "Leaward" <leaward_l@y...> wrote:
<snip>
> From the very start the whole 'categorizing' idea has been confusing
> to me, and I'm really glad I didn't volunteer to be a categorizer.
> I've watched what you guys have gone through to do this and know the
> stress you're under. But for the post-mortem, perhaps we could
> discuss that a better description could be added to the author
> nomination letter or rules or whatever about how important the
> sub-category is. To me, since the sub-category section came beneath
> the main category sections, I thought that came AFTER the first
> three choices and so it was more of a throw-away item only to be
> used if the first three weren't viable.

Yes, that was my impression as well during the liaison period.

> And there were no guidelines as to what type of sub-categories
> should be suggested -- for instance, though I could guess Mirkwood
> or Lothlorien or Rohan might be sub-categories, I would never have
> guessed to have put 'Grey Company' in as a sub-category, yet one
> has been created. And though I personally have two Grey Company
> stories, only one got put in the Grey Company category. They're
> fine with me where they are but a lot of the category moves looks
> rather ... arbitrary and inconsistent. I'm not criticizing, I'm
> just saying I find the whole process confusing.

I did Drama. Drama holds a Mirkwood subcategory based on what is
listed in the subcategory. But the amount of stories was less then
20, so it could never be graduated as a subcategory. The same with
Hobbits (I did that one as well), a lot of 'The Shire' mentioned as
sub-category, but not enough nominations to let it graduate. That is
how it was explained to me and how it got categorised. I sticked to
the subcategories as much as possible and if a subcategory got too
big I looked at it and made a new one. This is how Races/Places:
Hobbits: Merry & Pippin or Races/Places: Hobbits: Pippin was made,
just to give you some more insight. This is how I treated the four
main categories that I did, remaining as close to what the author
wished. This way: everybody can win!

But anyway... this morning, before you made the post, I happened to
add the wish for a more transparent and clearer procedure regarding
this, at least about subcategories that graduate, because I still
don't fully understand what happened and how the categoriser did it.
All for post-mortem!

> (And as an author liaison, I got to see a lot of the behind-the-
> scenes stuff that has been going on.)

Yups I know. I have seen the same as you have, but I was also
involved as categoriser.

All good points, and there is plenty of room for improvement... next
year. Because... boy it has been a ride! I am still exhausted.

Rhapsody

Msg# 4770

Way off topic ;) (was Re: Races/Places: Villains, Check Ballot #3) Posted by rhapsody\_the\_bard June 10, 2005 - 8:59:35 Topic ID# 4690
--- In MEFAwards@yahoogroups.com, C Dodd <rabidsamfan@v...> wrote:
<snip>

> Thing is, I'm a librarian.

Hey sweet! We're almost in the same profession. More information
systems & retrieval (& training) here.. but I know the basics of
cataloguing and so on very well.

> I know that all categorization schemes are arbitrary. (Even
> alphabetization can vary according to some arbitrary choices.)The
> minute we start putting things in a hierarchy some considerations
> are going to be left by the wayside and other considerations are
> going to take on an inflated priority. When you throw category
> viability based on numbers into the mix, it's bound to mean some
> clipped corners as pegs are fit into holes.

Yes and no. Categorization is based on a philosophy (think of UDC,
Dewey, NLM and so on), if that principle is clear & transparent:
everybody can work with the system. But if you have to start from
scratch and everybody has their own take/view on it... you need to
have some base guidelines/instructions to begin with. Dare to make
decisions. Categorise on form, remain true to that, categorise on
given subcategories only: remain true to that. If you mix things...
people are bound to get lost. It would be the same in the library
when you say: ok all the red books first, then green, then blue. But
then all of a sudden you decide to mix the colours because you want
to have them all on subject together....

So there you are as patron, going for the section red, but then you
encounter a space where everything is mixed up.. the pattern gets
lost. It is all about making information accessible in a customer
friendly way...

> So I pretty much just accepted what I've been told, and am ready to
> run with that...

Just bear in mind that check ballot season was intended to be
finished before reading season, including the lovely views and
filters on them. My feeling is that this is all to come.

> (But, darn it, now I've got me *another* postmortem discussion
> idea. Oh, Marta...!)

Yeah, a nice soap box isn't it?

Rhapsody

Msg# 4774

Re: OT: (was Way Off Topic - and for that matter still is!) Classif Posted by C Dodd June 10, 2005 - 9:49:30 Topic ID# 4690
>
> Yes and no. Categorization is based on a philosophy (think of UDC,
> Dewey, NLM and so on), if that principle is clear & transparent:
> everybody can work with the system. But if you have to start from
> scratch and everybody has their own take/view on it... you need to
> have some base guidelines/instructions to begin with. Dare to make
> decisions. Categorise on form, remain true to that, categorise on
> given subcategories only: remain true to that. If you mix things...
> people are bound to get lost. It would be the same in the library
> when you say: ok all the red books first, then green, then blue. But
> then all of a sudden you decide to mix the colours because you want
> to have them all on subject together....
>
> So there you are as patron, going for the section red, but then you
> encounter a space where everything is mixed up.. the pattern gets
> lost. It is all about making information accessible in a customer
> friendly way...

Ah, once I was an idealist too... ;)

What I mean when I say that classification systems are arbitrary is
that the sequence of any system is set arbitrarily -- it has to be --
and the scope and priority of subcategories are set arbitrarily too.

And even when the sequence, priority and scope seem clear the fiddly
bits get decided arbitrarily. Why else would I have copies of the
Diary of Anne Frank which are in the D800s (for the Holocaust) and
copies which are in the DSs (with Israel?) Why are books about Paul
Robeson in E185.97 (Black Americans)as well as the PNs (Actors), and
not in the ML's (Musicians) at all?

Mind you arbitrariness in the library (or if you prefer,
"flexibility") can actually be a Good Thing. It means that I have to
decide whether to put all fiction in one sequence with good labelling
or by genres then authors, of course, but it also means that if I've
got a peculiar piece of shelving in one corner I can pull out a single
genre or format which fits that corner nicely and leave the rest of
my sequence alone without having to send people across the building to
find the Zs. And if I've got patrons who want a specialized subset
(I'm thinking the Easy Reader crowd here) having their subset set
aside helps them and me.

And all that doesn't even address borderline books. Are the Magic
Schoolbus stories picture books, or do they belong under the
non-fiction subjects they talk about? Will my patrons find them more
easily if I shove them under "Series", or will that make work when I
need a book about electricity for a second grader?

Bringing it back closer to the topic at hand, if a story is about
Bilbo and baby Frodo meeting for the first time, how you decide
whether to put it under "Pre-Quest stories" or "Hobbits: children"
depends a little on whether or not you started with the Books/Time
Main Category group or the Races/Places group.

Msg# 4776

Re: Races/Places: Villains, Check Ballot #3 Posted by Ainaechoiriel June 10, 2005 - 11:13:38 Topic ID# 4690
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MEFAwards@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:MEFAwards@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Leaward
> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 7:20 AM
> To: MEFAwards@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [MEFAwards] Re: Races/Places: Villains, Check Ballot #3
>
> That's fine, I didn't say it had to be moved, I just wasn't
> sure if you did want all Orc stories together or not. It's
> fine where it is.
>
> From the very start the whole 'categorizing' idea has been
> confusing to me, and I'm really glad I didn't volunteer to be
> a categorizer.
> I've watched what you guys have gone through to do this and
> know the stress you're under. But for the post-mortem,
> perhaps we could discuss that a better description could be
> added to the author nomination letter or rules or whatever
> about how important the sub-category is. To me, since the
> sub-category section came beneath the main category sections,
> I thought that came AFTER the first three choices and so it
> was more of a throw-away item only to be used if the first
> three weren't viable. And there were no guidelines as to what
> type of sub-categories should be suggested -- for instance,
> though I could guess Mirkwood or Lothlorien or Rohan might be
> sub-categories, I would never have guessed to have put 'Grey
> Company' in as a sub-category, yet one has been created. And
> though I personally have two Grey Company stories, only one
> got put in the Grey Company category. They're fine with me
> where they are but a lot of the category moves looks rather
> ... arbitrary and inconsistent. I'm not criticizing, I'm
> just saying I find the whole process confusing. (And as an
> author liaison, I got to see a lot of the behind-the-scenes
> stuff that has been going on.)

It is confusing. Honestly, I think it's the hardest part of running these
awards. No joke.

And because there is an endless list of what stories could be about, we
can't really specify what is allowed as subcategories. We can only suggest.
Oh, we have our three defaults, based on format, but content-based... That's
way harder. And we do have to sort of fly by the seat of our pants. I think
was more organized about it last year. This year I felt like my brain had
been put in a blender and I couldn't think straight.

We can certainly explain a bit more about subcategories being under (that is
what "sub" means) the main categories but we can't tell people what to put
in there. We did put some suggestions at the end of the author notification
letter to give some idea: places, main characters, drama (yes, even other
categories), friendship, etc. (There was a longer list.)

But I think the letter was too long already and perhaps overwhelming.
Something for the post-mortem. We'll fix it in the fall.

> (I still don't understand how novels of 50,000+ words have to
> compete with short 1,000 word stories ... it wouldn't happen
> that way in a regular competition ... Why do we have to say
> the story length anyway since other than Drabbles that
> category seems to have been ignored?)

That has been a long debate in the MEFAs and we've only been around for a
year and a half. This year we are compromising by putting that information
out there so readers can see it but not categorizing by it. I believe that
categories should be based on content and not format, so length would never
determine a main category. I believe that any format-based subcategories
should really be based on different skills or set formats.

There are debates on just what constitutes a novel (how many words?) and a
novella, etc. There is no debate on what a real drabble is (100 words).
Nor is there debate on what a poem is. And an incomplete is pretty simple
to determine. Thus those are our only three default subcategories. You'll
notice that some categorizers did make a Vignette subcategory. Also not a
debateable: a vignette is one scene and one scene only. A short story in
someone's eye may be a novella in someone else's. It's much harder to draw
those lines.

Anyway, back to skills. Not everyone who writes drabbles can write poems.
It takes a different skill. You can write a review about an author as a
poet or drabbler. Does it take different skills to write a long story than
a short? That's a debate, too. I write both and see each as harder and
easier than the other in different ways. I think I'm the same writer either
way. I didn't know I was a drabbler until this year. I had absolutely no
idea I could write a parody filk until this year either. I definitely see
those as separate skills.

But we can debate all this again in post-mortem.

--Ainaechoiriel
MEFA Admin and Founder

"This evil cannot be concealed by the power of the Elves," Elrond said, "for
it is Windows-compatible, and freeware at that." --H.F.

http://gabrielle.sytes.net/mefa The Middle-Earth Fanfiction Awards

Blog: http://www.ainaechoiriel.blogspot.com

Msg# 4779

Re: Races/Places: Villains, Check Ballot #3 Posted by Ainaechoiriel June 10, 2005 - 11:24:06 Topic ID# 4690
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MEFAwards@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:MEFAwards@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of C Dodd
> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 8:27 AM
> To: MEFAwards@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [MEFAwards] Re: Races/Places: Villains, Check Ballot #3
>
> From an author point of view the category/subcategory thing
> was confusing for me too, and some of that came up because
> drabbles get split out twice, once as a story type and once
> as a subcategory.

This year in the ASC awards I happily went to the ENT General category and
was very surprised to find Archer/Reed slash stories there. Whoa. Hold on.
Shouldn't that be in a Romance category? Viablity doomed it. So I had to
go find summaries before I decided to read stories. (Aren't you glad we
ALWAYS show you summaries here at the MEFAs?)

At ASC the subcategories that you'd immediately think of are pretty limited
(Main categoreis are the series: TOS, VOY, ENT, DS9, etc.): humor, romance
(might be broken into different pairings if viable), AU. The rest the admin
just makes up as she goes along trying to group stories together by only
header information. And headers don't even include subcategory suggestions.
They do include pairings which gives you a clue if it's a romance.

Just a different perspective on the whole thing. (For new folks, I borrowed
the bones of the MEFAs from the Alt.StarTrek.Creative Awards and tweaked
them to fit a different fandom with no archive of our own.)

>
> Now I figure that you pulled out drabbles for the same reason
> that you pulled out poetry, particularly since (thank you!)
> you have been strict about the definition. And as a drabble
> writer, I like the notion of drabbles competing with
> drabbles. But at the same time I felt like my drabble series
> "Nine Riders" was about the Nazgul and once I knew that the
> subcategory "Nazgul" existed (which I didn't, until the check
> ballot stage) I could see that it belonged just as much in
> that subcategory as it did the drabble subcategory.

And at first I was very adamant about no sub-subcategories but as we got
categories with 39 drabbles I let up on that and said default subcategories
could have sub-subcategories if they had more than 20 stories. Thus Gondor
Drabbles as a subcategory (really a sub-subcategory in disguise) was born.
So, if there had been 20 Nazgul drabbles......

>
> While it was in the nomination phase, I did suggest a
> subcategory of "character exposition" for that story which
> was not picked up because
> a) no one else knew about it and b) it wasn't very good. If
> I'd known there was a subcategory for the Nazgul I'd have
> used it, but I didn't know where to look for a list of
> subcategories, and even if I had known, my understanding was
> limited and I thought that the subcategories had to be more
> encompassing than that.

I really like your next paragraph.

>
> Thing is, I'm a librarian. I know that all categorization
> schemes are arbitrary. (Even alphabetization can vary
> according to some arbitrary choices.)

Where do you put the Mc's? Some put them at the beginning of M. Some after
Ma (or a potential Mb). Some put them at the end of M.

> The minute we start
> putting things in a hierarchy some considerations are going
> to be left by the wayside and other considerations are going
> to take on an inflated priority. When you throw category
> viability based on numbers into the mix, it's bound to mean
> some clipped corners as pegs are fit into holes.

Exactly! But we have to have some kind of viability based on numbers or we'd
have 650 awards. Or 1200. Eek.

> So I pretty much just accepted what I've been told, and am
> ready to run with that...
>
> (But, darn it, now I've got me *another* postmortem discussion idea.
> Oh, Marta...!)

Yep!

--Ainaechoiriel
MEFA Admin and Founder

"This evil cannot be concealed by the power of the Elves," Elrond said, "for
it is Windows-compatible, and freeware at that." --H.F.

http://gabrielle.sytes.net/mefa The Middle-Earth Fanfiction Awards

Blog: http://www.ainaechoiriel.blogspot.com

Msg# 4784

Re: Races/Places: Villains, Check Ballot #3 Posted by MarigoldCotton@aol.com June 10, 2005 - 13:57:22 Topic ID# 4690
I had trouble too at first coming up with categories, though it got easier the more stories I nominated, and the more stories others nominated that I could look at to see what they had chosen. A standard list might be helpful next year. Marta, could you add that to your list if you haven't yet?

Mari

>And there were no guidelines as to what type of sub-categories
> should be suggested -- for instance, though I could guess Mirkwood
> or Lothlorien or Rohan might be sub-categories, I would never have
> guessed to have put 'Grey Company' in as a sub-category, yet one
> has been created. And though I personally have two Grey Company


--
Marigold's Red Book
www.berryarts.com/marigold

Marigold's Recommendations Page
http://www.geocities.com/marigoldsrecommendations/

Marigold's Live Journal
http://www.livejournal.com/users/marigoldg/

Tales of The Red Book
http://www.livejournal.com/users/talesofredbook/

There, peeping among the cloud-wrack above a dark tor high up in the mountains, Sam saw a white star twinkle for awhile. The beauty of it smote his heart, as he looked up out of the forsaken land, and hope returned to him. For like a shaft, clear and cold, the thought pierced him that in the end the Shadow was only a small and passing thing: there was light and high beauty for ever beyond its reach.

Sam, in Mordor, RoTK

Msg# 4785

Re: Races/Places: Villains, Check Ballot #3 Posted by rhapsody\_the\_bard June 10, 2005 - 14:00:06 Topic ID# 4690
--- In MEFAwards@yahoogroups.com, "Ainaechoiriel" <mefaadmin@e...> wrote:
<snip>

> > Thing is, I'm a librarian. I know that all categorization
> > schemes are arbitrary. (Even alphabetization can vary
> > according to some arbitrary choices.)
>
> Where do you put the Mc's? Some put them at the beginning of M.
> Some after Ma (or a potential Mb). Some put them at the end of M.

That depends on how the authorname is written ;) MacDonalds gets Mac
an McDonalds gets a McD ;) That is, with coding you shorten the author
name to three letters (generally used in the branches of industry I
worked in).

Rhapsody

Msg# 4786

Re: Races/Places: Villains, Check Ballot #3 Posted by rhapsody\_the\_bard June 10, 2005 - 14:05:04 Topic ID# 4690
--- In MEFAwards@yahoogroups.com, MarigoldCotton@a... wrote:
> I had trouble too at first coming up with categories, though it got
> easier the more stories I nominated, and the more stories others
> nominated that I could look at to see what they had chosen. A
> standard list might be helpful next year. Marta, could you add that
> to your list if you haven't yet?

Good idea! I added it to the wishlist (with your name attached to it).

Rhapsody

Msg# 4788

Re: Races/Places: Villains, Check Ballot #3 Posted by Leaward June 10, 2005 - 14:16:03 Topic ID# 4690
--- In MEFAwards@yahoogroups.com, "Ainaechoiriel" <mefaadmin@e...> wrote:
>

> Anyway, back to skills. Not everyone who writes drabbles can write
poems.
> It takes a different skill. You can write a review about an author as a
> poet or drabbler. Does it take different skills to write a long
story than
> a short? That's a debate, too. I write both and see each as harder and
> easier than the other in different ways. I think I'm the same
writer either
> way. I didn't know I was a drabbler until this year. I had
absolutely no
> idea I could write a parody filk until this year either. I
definitely see
> those as separate skills.


Oh, boy, is that ever true! Personally I find it much harder to write
a shorter story (says she who has just passed 100,000 words in her
latest (still incomplete) fic...) I love drabbling but I cannot write
poetry ... anyway, that's all totally off topic now.

Lea

Msg# 4795

Re: Races/Places: Villains, Check Ballot #3 Posted by C Dodd June 10, 2005 - 15:16:53 Topic ID# 4690
Before computers all the Mc's and Mac's got interfiled, but these days
we're more likely to go letter-by-letter because it's too hard to
write the program that can recognise the difference between MacHenry
and Machinery...


>
> That depends on how the authorname is written ;) MacDonalds gets Mac
> an McDonalds gets a McD ;) That is, with coding you shorten the author
> name to three letters (generally used in the branches of industry I
> worked in).
>
> Rhapsody
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MEFAwards/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> MEFAwards-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Msg# 4807

Re: drabbles and categorisation; was: Re: Races/Places: Villains, C Posted by Marta Layton June 10, 2005 - 21:46:11 Topic ID# 4690
Hi RSF,

On 10 Jun 2005, at 09:26, C Dodd wrote:

> Now I figure that you pulled out drabbles for the same reason that you
> pulled out poetry, particularly since (thank you!) you have been
> strict about the definition. And  as a drabble writer, I like the
> notion of drabbles competing with drabbles.

Yes, I am glad that we're strict about it. I know that several of my
double drabbles were originally tagged as drabbles, but that's only
because I thought that the 200-word drabble was a legitimate variation
on the drabble. (Because they're called double drabble... that was my
misunderstanding.) Anyway, I'm glad that the drabble definition is
clearer now, so I'll be able to put my things in the right place next
year. I think they're all properly sorted now.

> But at the same time I
> felt like my drabble series "Nine Riders" was about the Nazgul and
> once I knew that the subcategory "Nazgul" existed (which I didn't,
> until the check ballot stage) I could see that it belonged just as
> much in that subcategory as it did the drabble subcategory.
>

I understand your concern, and drabble series seem to straddle the line
between drabble and ficlet. I know of one series that has one drabble
for each queen of Gondor -- so that's 2600 words. Each of them is a
drabble, but together they tell a much fuller story than any single
drabble ever could. I think we need to discuss this more in the
post-mortem. My thought is that we should consider giving authors of
drabble series the option of placing them in drabble subcategories, or
in non-drabble subcategories.

Another thought (which I suggested last year) is to have a "drabble"
category, which we could then shape into appropriate subcategories. So
all drabbles and drabble series would *have* to have Gr: Drabble as
their first choice category. From there we would put them into
appropriate subcategories. This would amount to having Gr:
Drabble/Hobbit instead of RP: Hobbits/Drabble, for instance. This would
let us set up a subcategory for Drabble Series. But again, that's
something to discuss in the fall. I'll add both of these to the list.

> While it was in the nomination phase, I did suggest a subcategory of
> "character exposition" for that story which was not picked up because
> a) no one else knew about it and b) it wasn't very good.  If I'd known
> there was a subcategory for the Nazgul I'd have used it, but I didn't
> know where to look for a list of subcategories, and even if I had
> known, my understanding was limited and I thought that the
> subcategories had to be more encompassing than that.
>

No one knows what the subcategories will be because the categorisers
themselves don't know until after nomination season is over. Then we
sit down, look at the subcategories, and try to find ones in common.

If it would help, I can come up with a list of the subcategories for
the last two years to give people examples of the kinds of things they
might suggest.

> (But, darn it, now I've got me *another* postmortem discussion idea.
> Oh, Marta...!)
>

*snork* Now you know what I feel like! Go ahead and add it to the
database.

Marta
*****
Home is where you hang your @.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Msg# 4810

Re: Races/Places: Villains, Check Ballot #3 Posted by Marta Layton June 10, 2005 - 21:46:30 Topic ID# 4690
On 10 Jun 2005, at 14:57, MarigoldCotton@aol.com wrote:

> I had trouble too at first coming up with categories, though it got
> easier the more stories I nominated, and the more stories others
> nominated that I could look at to see what they had chosen. A standard
> list might be helpful next year. Marta, could you add that to your
> list if you haven't yet?
>

I'd be glad to. But just so I'm understanding, you want a list of
*sub*categories? I also typed up a categorisation guide at some point,
but I never found it at http://home.earthlink.net/~ainae/mefa/ . Ainae,
do you remember that? Did it ever get up to the website and I just
can't find it.

Marta
*****
Home is where you hang your @.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Msg# 4813

Re: drabbles and categorisation; was: Re: Races/Places: Villains, C Posted by C Dodd June 10, 2005 - 22:09:12 Topic ID# 4690
On 6/10/05, Marta Layton <melayton@gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes, I am glad that we're strict about it. I know that several of my
> double drabbles were originally tagged as drabbles, but that's only
> because I thought that the 200-word drabble was a legitimate variation
> on the drabble. (Because they're called double drabble... that was my
> misunderstanding.) Anyway, I'm glad that the drabble definition is
> clearer now, so I'll be able to put my things in the right place next
> year. I think they're all properly sorted now.
>
Not knowing the origin of drabbles when I started writing them (what
was it -- fourteen months ago?) I started calling 200 words
"droubbles" and 300 words "trabbles" to differentiate them from proper
drabbles. (And yes, I call 150 words a sesquidrabble.) As a result,
although I don't know how directly, LJ now has a community called
"toilanddrouble". I actually find any exact word length enough of a
challenge to differentiate it from an open form, but since I much
prefer the word "drabble" to mean 100 words precisely I'll continue to
use my coined terms for the variations.


>
> Another thought (which I suggested last year) is to have a "drabble"
> category, which we could then shape into appropriate subcategories. So
> all drabbles and drabble series would *have* to have Gr: Drabble as
> their first choice category. From there we would put them into
> appropriate subcategories. This would amount to having Gr:
> Drabble/Hobbit instead of RP: Hobbits/Drabble, for instance. This would
> let us set up a subcategory for Drabble Series. But again, that's
> something to discuss in the fall. I'll add both of these to the list.
>
That's one way of approaching it, certainly.
>
> No one knows what the subcategories will be because the categorisers
> themselves don't know until after nomination season is over. Then we
> sit down, look at the subcategories, and try to find ones in common.
>
> If it would help, I can come up with a list of the subcategories for
> the last two years to give people examples of the kinds of things they
> might suggest.

That would certainly be helpful from an author viewpoint. I just sort
of felt like I was making it up as I went along.

>
> *snork* Now you know what I feel like! Go ahead and add it to the
> database.
>
Since I have no idea how to add things to the database, I actually
already sent you a note about my idea in a side e-mail. (That is, if
I got the address right.) It's a little rambly, but I'm full of cold
meds today. It can wait till the postmortem as long as it doesn't get
lost, tho.

Msg# 4838

Re: drabbles and categorisation; was: Re: Races/Places: Villains, C Posted by Ainaechoiriel June 11, 2005 - 0:00:11 Topic ID# 4690
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MEFAwards@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:MEFAwards@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of C Dodd
> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 10:09 PM
> To: MEFAwards@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [MEFAwards] drabbles and categorisation; was:
> Re: Races/Places: Villains, Check Ballot #3
>
> On 6/10/05, Marta Layton <melayton@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Not knowing the origin of drabbles when I started writing
> them (what was it -- fourteen months ago?) I started calling
> 200 words "droubbles" and 300 words "trabbles" to
> differentiate them from proper drabbles. (And yes, I call
> 150 words a sesquidrabble.) As a result,
> although I don't know how directly, LJ now has a community called
> "toilanddrouble". I actually find any exact word length
> enough of a challenge to differentiate it from an open form,
> but since I much prefer the word "drabble" to mean 100 words
> precisely I'll continue to use my coined terms for the variations.

;-) I like that: sesquidrabble. What's a 500 word story? Pentadrabble?
I've written one of them.


> > Another thought (which I suggested last year) is to have a
> "drabble"
> > category, which we could then shape into appropriate
> subcategories. So
> > all drabbles and drabble series would *have* to have Gr: Drabble as
> > their first choice category. From there we would put them into
> > appropriate subcategories. This would amount to having Gr:
> > Drabble/Hobbit instead of RP: Hobbits/Drabble, for instance. This
> > would let us set up a subcategory for Drabble Series. But again,
> > that's something to discuss in the fall. I'll add both of
> these to the list.
> >
> That's one way of approaching it, certainly.

No, it's not. I've put my foot down on that last year. Main categories are
based on content, not format. You throw a format-based category in there
and you'll have at least as many subcategories as you have other main
categories. No, the easy solution is to have a Drabble Series subcategory,
so long as it's viable.

> >
> Since I have no idea how to add things to the database, I
> actually already sent you a note about my idea in a side
> e-mail. (That is, if I got the address right.) It's a
> little rambly, but I'm full of cold meds today. It can wait
> till the postmortem as long as it doesn't get lost, tho.

You log onto the MEFAwards Yahoo site. Click Databases and then find the
Wish List 2006 database. Open it. Click Add a Record. Enter your text, Save
and away you go.

The reason for putting off post-mortem until the month after the awards is
so it won't distract from what we're doing during the awards

--Ainaechoiriel
MEFA Admin and Founder

"This evil cannot be concealed by the power of the Elves," Elrond said, "for
it is Windows-compatible, and freeware at that." --H.F.

http://gabrielle.sytes.net/mefa The Middle-Earth Fanfiction Awards

Blog: http://www.ainaechoiriel.blogspot.com

Msg# 4847

Re: Races/Places: Villains, Check Ballot #3 Posted by ejackamack@aol.com June 11, 2005 - 7:33:57 Topic ID# 4690
In a message dated 6/10/2005 3:00:19 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
rhapsody74@gmail.com writes:

> > Thing is, I'm a librarian. I know that all categorization
> > schemes are arbitrary. (Even alphabetization can vary
> > according to some arbitrary choices.)
>
> Where do you put the Mc's? Some put them at the beginning of M.
> Some after Ma (or a potential Mb). Some put them at the end of M.




I'm not a librarian, but I work at BWI, which sells books to public
libraries, and I can tell you that everyone does things differently. Infinite
diversity in infinite combinations and all that....

Isabeau


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Msg# 4848

Re: Races/Places: Villains, Check Ballot #3 Posted by dwimmer\_laik June 11, 2005 - 10:22:02 Topic ID# 4690
--- In MEFAwards@yahoogroups.com, ejackamack@a... wrote:
>
> In a message dated 6/10/2005 3:00:19 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> rhapsody74@g... writes:
>
> > > Thing is, I'm a librarian. I know that all categorization
> > > schemes are arbitrary. (Even alphabetization can vary
> > > according to some arbitrary choices.)
> >
> > Where do you put the Mc's? Some put them at the beginning of M.
> > Some after Ma (or a potential Mb). Some put them at the end of M.
>
>
>
>
> I'm not a librarian, but I work at BWI, which sells books to public
> libraries, and I can tell you that everyone does things differently.
Infinite
> diversity in infinite combinations and all that....
>
> Isabeau

Had the same problem when I was filing stuff as a campus work study
clerk. Everyone had a different theory, with the result that the M's
were refiled by every new clerk, because everyone thought everyone
else's filing was out of order. Same with the D's and the L's, thanks
to names like DelaTorre and De La Torre--same name, but because the
computers file the second one first, so did a lot of people,
regardless of the first initial or name, and things like "D'angelo"
were filed before "Dabrov" for similar reasons.

Our files were so very unpretty...

Dwim



>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Msg# 4866

Re: Races/Places: Villains, Check Ballot #3 Posted by MarigoldCotton@aol.com June 11, 2005 - 16:21:21 Topic ID# 4690
Yes, sub-categories - just a list of some samples that might help folks see what sorts of choices they have at the start of the nominating period. They wouldn't be limited to what is on the list of course, they would just be examples of what sorts of things the nominator or author has to chose from.

At first I had trouble coming up with them and then I later when I was seeing nominations done by others, I was sometimes disappointed that I had not thought of certain sub-categories for the stories I had nominated, and by then it was too late to change them.

A list might make it easier to choose or invent just the right ones.

Mari




>On 10 Jun 2005, at 14:57, MarigoldCotton@aol.com wrote:
>
>> I had trouble too at first coming up with categories, though it got
>> easier the more stories I nominated, and the more stories others
>> nominated that I could look at to see what they had chosen. A standard
>> list might be helpful next year. Marta, could you add that to your
>> list if you haven't yet?
>>
>
>I'd be glad to. But just so I'm understanding, you want a list of
>*sub*categories? I also typed up a categorisation guide at some point,
>but I never found it at http://home.earthlink.net/~ainae/mefa/ . Ainae,
>do you remember that? Did it ever get up to the website and I just
>can't find it.
>
>Marta
>*****
>Home is where you hang your @.
>
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


--
Marigold's Red Book
www.berryarts.com/marigold

Marigold's Recommendations Page
http://www.geocities.com/marigoldsrecommendations/

Marigold's Live Journal
http://www.livejournal.com/users/marigoldg/

Tales of The Red Book
http://www.livejournal.com/users/talesofredbook/

There, peeping among the cloud-wrack above a dark tor high up in the mountains, Sam saw a white star twinkle for awhile. The beauty of it smote his heart, as he looked up out of the forsaken land, and hope returned to him. For like a shaft, clear and cold, the thought pierced him that in the end the Shadow was only a small and passing thing: there was light and high beauty for ever beyond its reach.

Sam, in Mordor, RoTK